The Law Office of Kurt H King

May 10, 2021

SSI reduced by Maintenance/Alimony or Award of Spouse’s Pension/Retirement

Folks divorcing later in life sometimes face the issue of what happens to SSI (Supplemental Security Income) if judge awards Maintenance (aka, Alimonty) and/or part of the spouse’s Pension/Retirement. Simply put, will you still receive the same amount of SSI if you receive awards of Maintenance or part of your spouse’s Pension or Retirement? Or will your SSI be reduced?

If you face that situation, you may find this law helps answer your question by indicating that awards of Maintenance or Pension/Retirement do reduce SSI practically dollar-for-dollar.

First, Federal law, section 42 U.S.C. section 1382a, (also known as section 1612 of the Social Security Act), clearly includes both award of (1) Maintenance and of (2) Pension/Retirement, as part of “income” for SSI purposes:

            “Sec. 1612. [42 U.S.C. 1382a] (a) For purposes of this title, income means both

            earned income and unearned income; and—

                        (1) earned income . . . ;

                        (2) unearned income means all other income, including

(A) support and maintenance furnished in cash or kind; except [none applicable];

(B) any payments received as an annuity, pension, retirement, or disability benefit, including veterans’ compensation and pensions, workmen’s compensation payments, old-age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits, railroad retirement annuities and pensions, and unemployment insurance benefits; . . . .”

Second, regulation 20 C.F.R. 416.1123 states that such Unearned Income will be counted in reducing SSI payments to the person receiving SSI:

            “Section 416.1123.  How we count unearned income.

                 (a)  When we count unearned incomeWe count unearned income at the earliest of

            the following points: when you receive it or when it is credited to your account or set

            aside for your use.  We determine your unearned income for each month.  We

describe exceptions to the rule on how we count unearned income in paragraphs (d), (e)

and (f) of this section.”  [Exceptions inapplicable.]

                       

Third, the official Guidance entitled “Understanding Supplemental Security Income SSI Income—2021 Edition,” from the Social Security Administration’s website, again makes clear on the first page:

“Income is any item an individual receives in cash or in-kind that can be used to

meet his or her need for food or shelter.”

That Guidance then defines four types of income that are counted when computing SSI—Earned Income, Unearned Income, In-Kind Income, and Deemed Income.  As noted above, Maintenance and Pension/Retirement payments both count as Unearned Income.

And, Example A of the Guidance illustrates how Unearned Income is credited against the SSI amount otherwise due (using Social Security as the example of unearned income which is analogous to maintenance or pension/retirement varieties of unearned income)—

EXAMPLE A—SSI Federal Benefit with only UNEARNED INCOME

Total monthly income = $300 (Social Security benefit)

1)         $300    (Social Security benefit)         [the unearned income example]

             –  20     (Not counted)                         [$20 per month exclusion from income]

            =$280  (Countable income)

2)         $794    (SSI Federal benefit rate)

            -280     (Countable income)

            =$514  (SSI Federal benefit)

Conclusion: Example A shows the basically dollar-for-dollar reduction of SSI due to an award of Maintenance or Pension/Retirement in favor or the person receiving SSI in a divorce case. as both constitute countable Unearned Income.

Kurt H. King

Law Office of Kurt H. King, 20 E. Franklin, Liberty, Clay County, Missouri 64068

816.781.6000

Family Law, Personal Injury & Worker’s Compensation, Employment Law, General Matters

December 1, 2020

Amend Your Divorce Judgment for Bump Up in Missouri PERS/PEERS Retirement Payments

Recently, two elderly former educators who taught in Missouri public schools for years filed a joint motion to amend their divorce judgment to provide that neither of them would continue to have any survivorship rights whatsoever in the PERS/PEERS retirement of the other. By the Court issuing an amended judgment of dissolution of their marriage, both the former husband and former wife received a “bump up” in their monthly retirement payments from PERS/PEERS.

This is because effective August 28, 2019, Missouri lawmakers added to subsection 3 of sections 169.141 and 169.715, RSMo, to enable persons whose marriage was dissolved before September 1, 2017, to receive increased monthly retirement benefits:

            “3.  Any person receiving a retirement allowance under sections 169.010 to 169.140 who elected a reduced retirement allowance under subsection 3 of section 169.070 with his or her spouse as the nominated beneficiary may have the retirement allowance increased to the amount the retired member would be receiving had the retired member elected option 1 if:

            *                                              *                                              *

(2)  The marriage of the retired person and the nominated spouse was dissolved before September 1, 2017, and:

                        *                                              *                                              *

            (b) The dissolution decree does not  provide for sole retention by the retired person

            of all rights in the retirement allowance and the parties obtain an amended or modified

            dissolution decree after September 1, 2017, which provides for sole retention by the

            retired person of all rights in the retirement allowance . . . .”

Other folks who want to increase their monthly PERS/PEERS payments may also want to file a motion to amend the divorce judgment.

Kurt H. King, Law Office of Kurt H. King

816.781.6000; 20 E. Franklin, Liberty, Missouri 64068; kurthking@swbell.net

Family Law, Business and Injury Litigation, Employment Discrimination/Retaliation; General Matters

January 26, 2012

7 Things to Remember in Missouri Divorce Cases

7 legal tibits that make a difference–

1.  Social Security benefits, including disability, shall not be divided in a Missouri Dissolution of Marriage case.  (section 169.572 of Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri)

2.  Likewise, Missouri Public Teachers Retirement benefits, which largely take the place of Social Security benefits for such teachers, shall not be divided in a Missouri divorce case.  (section 169.572 also)

3.  For much the same reason, Tier I of railroad retirement basically pays railroad workers what they would have received in Social Security benefits and therefore is not to be divided by the court in a divorce case.  Federal law, 45 U.S.C. section 231m, exempts Tier I benefits from the property a divorce court may divide.   The Railroad Retirement Board will not honor a court dissolution of marriage judgment/order that divides Tier I.  Only Tier II may be divided.

4.  Military disability benefits  are non-marital property of the soldier that the court shall not divide in a divorce case.  But ordinary military retirement benefits are marital property which may be dividedImportant:  the military spouse may elect to receive military disability benefits and if so the ordinary military retirement benefits are reduced dollar for dollar.  A legitimate reason for taking disability instead of ordinary retirement is that the disability benefits are not taxed as income to the receiving spouse.  Settlement agreements should prohibit the military spouse from electing to take disability benefits instead of ordinary retirement, or to indemnify the other spouse if the military spouse so elects and consequently reduces the amount of ordinary military retirement available to the other spouse.  (Morgan v. Morgan, 249 S.W.3d 226, 230 (Mo. Ct. App. W.D. 2008)

5.  In a Missouri divorce case, court cannot validly order a spouse to maintain a life insurance policy(s) to support the chilren in the event of the death of the spouse charged with paying child support, UNLESS the parties so agree [most likely in a settlement agreement in the divorce proceeding].  (Weiss v. Weiss, 954 S.W.2d 456, 459 (Mo. Ct. App. S.D. 19970); Wheeler v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 999 S.W.2d 279, 287-88 (Mo. Ct. App. E.D. 1999))  But court may order a spouse to maintain life insurance for other reasons such as to secure the payment of maintenance (formerly called alimony).

6.  Social Security paid for a child due to the non-custodial parent’s  disability may be credited against his/her child support obligation.  (Wallace v. Wallace, 269 S.W. 3d 479 (Mo. Ct. App. E.D. 2008); Weaks v. Weaks, 821 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Mo. 1991))

7.  Social Security paid for a child due to the custodial parent’s disability shall  not be a direct dollar for dollar credit against the non-custodial parent’s child support obligation.  (Gerlach v. Adair, 211 S.W.3d 663, 667 (Mo. Ct. App. W.D. 2007).  But the court may still consider–not necessarily as a full dollar for dollar credit but simply as one of many possible factors–that the child has income of his/her own in the form of Social Security benefits.  (See Missouri Child Support Guidelines at Section G, Comment (1).)

Kurt H. King

Law Office of Kurt H. King, 20 E. Franklin, Liberty, Clay County, Missouri 64068

816.781.6000

Divorce & Modification, Child Custody & Modification, Paternity

Bankruptcy, Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation

www.kurthking.com

Blog at WordPress.com.